Skip to main content

Putting a Price on Innovation

Founded 30 years ago at the dawn of biotech, Genentech is a legend in an industry where companies yearn to do what it does: to make billions of dollars off of novel drugs while remaining true to innovation and science.

Unfortunately, it's also a legend being positioned for a fall.

That's because the Swiss drug giant Roche, which has owned a majority of Genentech shares since 1990, wants to buy the 44 percent of shares in the company that it does not already hold. Late Thursday, Genentech said it had formed a special committee to evaluate the $89 per-share offer, which many analysts and shareholders believe is too low.

At any price, this whopper of a deal could mean an end to Genentech’s distinctive culture of innovation, despite promises from Roche not to meddle.

It would also provide more evidence that the days of “Big Biotech” – a relatively small subset of successful companies in an industry that takes years to develop products and to become profitable – are over. Big Biotech is being swallowed by Big Pharma.


Facing slender pipelines for new drugs and expiring patents for blockbusters, big pharmaceuticals are snapping up medium and large biotechs with abandon. Biotech’s biggest selling product line this year will not be new meds for cancer or Alzheimer’s, but deals.

Roche’s initial Genentech offer is $43.7 billion, equal to over half of all of biotech’s revenues last year. The offer was 9 percent over premium last Friday, but the share price has quickly risen to $95, signaling that shareholders want more. Analysts expect Roche to pay $100 a share if they are serious about the purchase.

"The special committee intends to proceed in a timely manner to review the Roche proposal, which was both unsolicited and unexpected," said committee chairman Charles Sanders in a statement. "The outcome of this process has not been pre-determined, and there can be no assurance that the special committee will approve any transaction with Roche."

In the past, Pharma companies have been content to support certain biotechs like farm teams in baseball through licensing and milestone deals, worried that engulfing them might destroy the innovation.

No more. In April, Japanese pharma giant Takeda bought Millennium Pharmaceuticals for $8.8 billion, and last year biotech biggies such as Medimmune were sold for billions of dollars. And remember Chiron? Another biotech pioneer for the San Francisco Bay Area, Chiron was purchased by Novartis in 2005, and now seems to have vanished.

Nobody seems as intent on buying new companies as Roche. Already this week it has bought Canada’s Arius Research for $189 million, and Mirus Bio of Madison, Wisconsin for $125 million, on top of the Genentech offer late last week. Apparently, new Roche C.E.O. Severin Schwan likes to shop.

Roche argues that duplications in the two companies are costing hundreds of millions dollars a year, and efforts to keep the two companies separate keep operations from being as smooth as they might be.

But critics of the deal insist that this is really about Roche taking advantage of a weak dollar and a declining stock market.

One thing is likely: there may not be another Genentech for a long time. Any company with the potential will be snatched before it has a chance.

This may not be healthy for the larger pharma industry, which not only needs more novel drugs, but it also desperately needs novel new business strategies and new cultures that are able to keep the innovations coming even in a huge company.

Genentech was the most important player in this experiment to find a new way to incorporate both.

If the deal gets done, the ball will be in Roche’s court to see if its buying sprees will help it become more like Genentech, or will turn Genentech into another disappearing act like Chiron.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Key to a Better Life

Time management is basically about being focused. The Pareto Principle also known as the '80:20 Rule' states that 80% of efforts that are not time managed or unfocused generates only 20% of the desired output. However, 80% of the desired output can be generated using only 20% of a well time managed effort. Although the ratio '80:20' is only arbitrary, it is used to put emphasis on how much is lost or how much can be gained with time management. Some people view time management as a list of rules that involves scheduling of appointments, goal settings, thorough planning, creating things to do lists and prioritizing. These are the core basics of time management that should be understood to develop an efficient personal time management skill. These basic skills can be fine tuned further to include the finer points of each skill that can give you that extra reserve to make the results you desire.

How to Get What You Want

One of the things I've been very good at is manifesting what I want in my life. People often ask me how I do it. How at only 35 have I managed to have two kids, live in a dream house on the ocean in Hermosa Beach, build two million dollar businesses and attract my ideal life partner? Today, I want to share with you my secrets for having everything I want so that you can too. First, you must understand that you are already a master at manifestation. Look around you and understand that everything around you right now has been created by you and your thoughts. If you are not happy with what you see, take full responsibility for that, not from a place of shame or guilt, but from a place of empowered knowingness that because you have created it, you can also change it. Next, become aware that the secret to having everything you want in life is first knowing what you want.

Hyperion for battlespace communication and information services

Hyperion is a collaborative project between BT, General Dynamics, QinetiQ , Southampton University and Imperial College. It is a cluster project within the Ministry of Defence Data and Information Fusion Defence Technology Centre . Technical Objectives To create an adaptive agent-based architecture capable of significantly enhancing the functionality and resilience of Networked Enabled Capability (NEC) Information Fusion and C2 processes. In particular, by providing an adaptive reconfigurable capability for battlespace communication and information services. Science Objectives To investigate novel algorithms for self-organising network infrastructures in support of military requirements. The specific areas for research are: resilient service-oriented peer-to-peer (P2P) architectures, representation frameworks for network-centric information fusion, mixed initiative information retrieval and integration, complex policy management and control, agent negotiation protocols for NE