Skip to main content

How to Reach the CEO

In a comment to my previous entry “How to Sell to a CEO” karishmak asked:
“How do I reach the CEO? We can be very professional and act like a CEO but its very difficult to reach the CEO especially in the offshore software industry where you are restricted to talk through phones, emails and skypes. Can any one help?”
Great question.

There are three solutions to this problem:

1. Work with lower level contacts to gradually win access.
2. Enlist the help of a colleague, peer or friend of the CEO.
3. Trick the CEO into taking your call.

Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages. Let’s start with the first method, because it’s the way that most customers would prefer you approach the situation. My description of the first method is based upon the wisdom of Neil Rackham, author of the classic sales book “Spin Selling.” He points out that in most companies the “decision” to buy (or not buy) an offering is often shared between three individuals:


1. The “budget owner.” This is the CEO or (if your offering is small potatoes) some lesser executive.
2. The “problem owner.” This is the operational manager whose department actually needs your offering.
3. The “access owner.” This is the person in the operational manager’s department who is willing to talk to you and (hopefully) sponsor you.

Typically your first customer call is to the “access owner” who then agrees to sponsor you to the “problem owner.” If the “problem owner” is satisfied that you can provide something of value, the “problem owner” gives you access to the “budget owner.” If you can get all three people to say “YES,” then you have a sale.

To make this method work, your sales approach needs to be different for each type of decision maker.

The “access owner,” being lower level, is primarily interested in his or her own credibility and position in the hierarchy. This person will want to be certain that you are credible and can deliver as promised, so that bringing you forward will enhance the status of the “access owner.” At this point in the sale, your emphasis is on creating an aura of personal credibility and building a strong relationship.

The “problem owner” is typically too busy to talk to you unless somebody else in the organization (i.e. the “access owner”) is willing to put his job on the line by sponsoring you. The “problem owner” is primarily concerned with whether your offering will have an actual benefit in the part of the business that’s the responsibility of the “problem owner.” At this point in the sale, your emphasis is on the solution and the benefits that it will provide.

The “budget owner” (i.e. the CEO) isn’t interested in your offering, per se, but on the impact that your offering will have on the proverbial bottom line. (See my previous post on this subject.) So at this point in the sale, it’s all about making the decision to buy into a no-brainer. The way you do this is to make the “access owner” and the “problem owner” into your advocates.

The advantage of this method is that, when you’re done, everybody is on board. By contrast, if you sell directly to the CEO, you still may need to backtrack down to the “problem owner” who may resent that you went over his head. The disadvantage of this method is that it can consume a great deal of time, especially if (as is often the case) the “access owner” lacks in the internal credibility to be an effective sponsor.

In my next post, I’ll explain how to get access to the CEO without working through the hoi-poloi in the management chain. That's when you need the kind of chutzpah I was talking about in my previous post.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to Qualify Leads

By: Geoffrey James I’ve been harping on lead generation because that’s where sales pros need a lot of help. In fact, over 70 percent of sales leaders are not satisfied with their lead generation process, according to a survey of sales managers conducted by Jim Dickie , the head of the research and benchmarking firm CSO Insights. Actually, I’m surprised that number isn’t higher because I’ve never, ever heard a sales rep say: “Gee we’ve been getting plenty of great leads!” According to Tom Roth , president of Wilson Learning , the root of that dissatisfaction lies in the widely-held (but hilariously mistaken) belief that the best way to get higher sales volumes is to have the sales team call on as many prospects as possible. As a result, marketing groups tend to generate long lists of generic “prospects” in the hopes that the sales pros can turn those so-called “prospects” into real live customers. Then management turns the screws on the sales teams to make more cold calls. Howe...

Dream Your Future

Hopeless is Just a Word Everybody, at some point of his or her life, has dreamed of being somebody special, somebody big. Who hasn't fantasized about being the one who hits the game-winning homer? Who hasn't dreamed of being the homecoming queen? And how many times have we dreamed of being rich, or successful, or happy with our relationships? Often, we dream big dreams and have great aspirations. Unfortunately, our dreams remain just that – dreams. And our aspirations easily collect dust in our attic. This is a sad turn of events in our life. Instead of experiencing exciting adventures in self actualization, we get caught up in the humdrum of living from day-to-day just barely existing. But you know what? Life could be so much better, if only we learned to aim higher. The most common problem to setting goals is the word impossible. Most people get hung up thinking I can't do this. It's too hard. It's too impossible. No one can do this. However, if everyone thought t...

What is Team Effectiveness?

Team effectiveness refers to the system of getting people in a company or institution to work together effectively. The idea behind team effectiveness is that a group of people working together can achieve much more than if the individuals of the team were working on their own. Team effectiveness is determined by a number of factors, such as: * The right mix of skills. Team effectiveness depends in part on bringing together people who have different skills that somehow complement each other. This can mean different technical abilities or communication skills. In fact, teaming up people who share the exact same characteristics is often a recipe for disaster. Team effectiveness depends on people taking on different roles in a group setting. If there is no agreement on who does what in the group, it is unlikely that the team will prosper. * The right motivation. Team effectiveness is directly linked to the interest that the group has on the project. If the job is too easy or ...